|
|
|
|
| 2-3 players, 30-60 minutes, 12 years and older |
| Author | Peer Sylvester |
| Illustrators | Richard Stubenvoll
Andreas Töpfer |
| Published by | Histogame |
| Online since | 2011-09-18 |
| Developed by | (Brer Bear) |
| Boardgamegeek | 29937 |
| Complexity | 2,68/5 |
| Yucata.de owns a license for the online version of this game. A big "thank you" to the copyright owners (publisher and/or author and illustrator) who make it possible to have this game for free online here! |
|
|
|
|
New on Yucata: King of Saba
King of Siam by Peer Sylvester was published 5 years ago by Histogame. To
celebrate this small anniversary, the author created an alternative map which can
now be played online on Yucata. You will find more information at the bottom of this page. Scroll
down or click here.
Have fun with this new map!
External links:
Notes:
- Rules booklets in other languages (fra, it, esp, ned, pol, rus) can
be downloaded from the
publisher’s website.
- Please read the section about the online game
before playing your first game.
- At the bottom of this page you can find the Designer’s
notes (from the rules booklet).
- The 4-player team game is currently not available.
It will probably be added when all necessary improvements for a team scoring are
done.
Introduction
Siam, 1874. The King of Siam, Rama V Phra Maha Chulalongkorn, is very open
to European ideas and wants to modernize the country. His initial reforms, however,
meet open resistance from the higher nobility. Soon a serious power-struggle breaks
out between the Royalists, the Lao from Siam’s North, and the Malays from
Siam’s South.
While this is happening, Siam is a target of the European powers, Great Britain
and France, both of which are looking to reduce Siam to a colony in their empires.
It is obvious to all struggling factions that maintaining the country’s freedom
and open expression of their dissent are in conflict and the result is a tightrope
walk. Siam must preserve the appearance of tranquility, despite all the turmoil
beneath the surface. Siam’s motto, "Unity brings Happiness", is
dangerously close to being an empty saying.
Game components
- 1 game board
- 54 "followers" (18 yellow, 18 red, 18 blue)
- 1 pack of playing cards consisting of:
- 4 sets of action cards (8 cards each)
- 4 playing aid cards
- 1 die cut sheet with:
- 8 control markers "Rama" (yellow)
- 8 control markers "Lao" (red)
- 8 control markers "Malay" (blue)
- 4 control markers "British"
- 4 markers "King"
- 8 province tiles
Basic concept
- KING OF SIAM is a game for 2 to 4 players. In the 2-player and 3-player game,
everyone is playing against everyone else. In the 4-player game, the players
are in two partnerships, with the players sitting opposite each other as
partners.
- By playing action cards, the players try to give one of the 3 factions (Rama,
Lao, Malay) control of Siam. Simultaneously, they try to increase
their own influence over the winning faction.
- At the end of the game, the player with the greatest influence over the winning
faction is the winner. In a 4-player game, the partner of the winning player
shares the win.
- But be careful! It is possible for Siam to become a British colony. In that
case, the victory conditions are different.
- A 2-player game takes about 30 minutes to play, the 3-player game 45 minutes, and
the 4 player game about an hour.
Setting up the game
Illustration of the game
setup on simmonsgames.com
- In the two-player game, two followers of each colour are removed from the
game.
- Each player receives one set of 8 action cards.
- Each player randomly draws 1 playing aid card. On this card, there are 2
followers depicted in the upper left corner. Every player receives the followers
depicted on their card and places them in front of him, visible to everyone.
NOTE: The playing aid No. 4 is used in the 4-player game only; the player
with this card receives the same followers as his left neighbour.
- The game board shows Siam and its 8 provinces. Each of the 3 factions has
one home province. A faction’s home province is marked with a depiction
of two followers of that faction’s colour.
- Four followers are placed in each province:
- In a home province, 2 followers of the corresponding colour and 2 randomly chosen
followers are placed.
- In every other province, 4 randomly chosen followers are placed.
- The remaining followers are placed in a common pool on the Siam coat of arms
(lower-right corner).
- The 8 province tiles are placed in random order, one in each box numbered
"1" to "8". The tiles are placed face-up, so that the province
name is visible.
Course of the game
- Each game consists of 8 power-struggles. In each struggle, the factions fight
for the control of one province. The power-struggles are conducted in the
order of the laid out province tiles: The first struggle is for the province in
box "1"; the next struggle is for the province in box "2"; and
so on.
- The players take turns. The first player in the game is the one with the
lowest number on his play aid, and play proceeds clockwise around the board.
In his turn, a player chooses either to play ONE action card (see section
"Actions") or pass.
- A player who passed in his previous turn is permitted to "re-enter"
when it is his turn again. A player is never required to play an action card (he
may pass every turn). As long as a player holds action cards he is never forced
to pass.
- When all players have passed in a row, the power-struggle ends by
checking the contested province to see which faction has gained control over it
(see section "Completing a power-struggle").
- After one power-struggle is completed, the starting player in the next struggle
is the one sitting clockwise from the player who passed last.
|
|
Alfred
|
Benjamin
|
Charles
|
|
1.
|
passes
|
passes
|
action
|
|
2.
|
passes
|
action
|
passes
|
|
3.
|
passes
|
passes
=Finish
|
|
Example: The upper table shows the general course of a power-struggle. After
all 3 players have passed in a row, the power-struggle is completed and it is determined
which faction controls the contested province. Benjamin was the last player to pass,
so the starting player in the next power-struggle will be Charles.
Actions
- If a player decides to play an action card, he lays down ONE of his action
cards in front of him, stacking it on top of his previous played cards, so
that only the top card is visible.
- The action on the played card must be executed. EXCEPTION: It is permitted
to play an action card which is wholly or partly illegal to execute. In such a case,
the action of the card is executed as far as legally possible.
- Note that the played action card can influence any province. It is not
legal, however, to put followers into a province which is already controlled
by a faction or by the British due to a completed power-struggle.
- After executing the action, the player has to take any one follower from any
one province. He puts this follower in front of him, thus increasing his influence
on the faction the follower belongs to. The follower has to be taken, even
if the action is illegal (partially or completely) to execute.
- Played action cards are never returned to a player. Therefore a player can
play a maximum of 8 action cards per game.
- IMPORTANT: The very last action card of a game may be played only
if the player (or his partner) achieves victory by executing it.
Example: In a 3-player-game, all action cards except one have been played.
This very last action card (i.e. the 24th action card) is held by Alfred. He may
only play the card if he achieves victory with it.
The actions in detail:
|
|
Maharacha
("King" in Thai). The player changes the order of the power-struggles
by swapping 2 face-up province tiles. On one of these 2 tiles he puts a "King"
marker. NOTE: a tile already marked with a "King" cannot be swapped.
|
|
|
Khon Thai
("Free People"). The player moves one follower of each faction from the
common pool into a province. (NOTE: if a faction has no followers in the common
pool, no follower of that faction is moved.) Followers from different factions can
go into different provinces.
This action card has two copies per set.
|
|
|
1 vs. 1
The player swaps 1 follower in a province with 1 follower in another province. The
two provinces do not have to be adjacent. It is permitted to swap followers of the
same colour.
IMPORTANT: If two action cards "1 vs. 1" are played one
after the other, it is not permitted to use the second card to "undo"
the swap of the previous one; that is a player may not simply swap followers of
the same factions between the same provinces as before but in the opposite direction.
The same is true for two action cards "2 vs. 1" which are played
one after the other.
|
|
|
2 vs. 1
The player swaps 2 followers in a province with 1 follower in another province.
The two provinces must be adjacent. It is permitted to swap followers of
the same colour.
IMPORTANT: If two action cards "2 vs. 1" are played one
after the other, it is not permitted to use the second card to "undo"
the swap of the previous one; that is a player may not simply swap followers of
the same factions between the same provinces as before but in the opposite direction.
The same is true for two action cards "1 vs. 1" which are played
one after the other.
|
|
|
Rama
The player puts 2 Rama followers from the common pool in one or two provinces. He
can only choose provinces which are adjacent to an already controlled Rama
province or which are adjacent to the Rama home province. In the latter case
the Rama home province may not be controlled by another faction nor by the British.
|
|
|
Lao
The Lao version of the Rama action card.
|
|
|
Malai
The Malai version of the Rama action card.
|
Completing a power-struggle
- When all players have passed in a row, the contested province is checked
to see which faction gains control over it.
- The contested province is the one whose province tile is face-up in the lowest
numbered box.
- The faction with the most followers in the province gains control
over it. One of their control markers is placed onto the province capital.
- If there is a tie between 2 or all factions, then the British march in
and take control. This is true even if there are no followers of any faction in
the province. One British control marker is placed onto the province capital.
- In both cases, all followers in the province are moved to the common pool.
After that, the province tile is turned face down and the power-struggle is completed.
Examples: In the Sukothai province, there are more Rama (yellow) followers
than any other colour. Thus they control the province. Place a Rama control marker
on the capital.
Same situation. In the Lan Na province there is a tie between 2 factions. Thus the
British march in. Place a British control marker on the capital.
Winning the game
Which faction reigns in Siam?
- The game ends immediately whenever the British control 4 provinces.
Siam is then considered a British colony.
NOTE: British domination of Siam is quite rare.
- If Siam does not become a British colony, then the game ends after all
8 power-struggles have been completed. In this case, Siam is controlled by the
faction which controls the most provinces. If factions are tied,
the winning faction is whichever of the tied factions was the last to gain control
of a province.
Example: The control markers demonstrate the order in which the various factions
seized control of a province. As seen above, both the Lao (red) and Rama (yellow)
control 3 provinces each. Since the Rama were the last tied faction to gain control
of a province (power-struggle no. 7), the Rama reign in Siam.
Example: After power-struggle 6, the British control 4 provinces. Therefore
the game ends immediately with Siam as a British colony.
Who is the winning player?
- If Siam is a British colony, the winning player is the one who has the
most complete sets of followers. (A set consists of one blue, one red, and one
yellow follower each.) If there is a tie, the tied player who played an action
card last WINS.
NOTE: In a 4-player game, the victory conditions are slightly altered, see section
"The 4-player game".
- If Siam is not a British colony, the winning player is the one who has gathered
the most followers of the winning faction. If players are tied, victory
goes to the tied player who has the most followers of the second ranked faction.
While there is still a tie, the still-tied player who played an action card
last LOSES.
Example: Siam became a British colony. Alfred and Benjamin have gathered 1
complete set of followers, while Charles has gathered 2 complete sets. So he is
the winner.
Example: The Lao (red) are reigning in Siam and the Rama (yellow) are second
ranked. Alfred and Benjamin have the most Lao followers, but are tied. Since Alfred
has more followers of the second ranked Rama, he is the winner.
The 4-player-game
- In a 4-player-game, the 2 players sitting opposite each other are one
partnership. Communication between players is not allowed (even
if they are partners). Players may not even show each other their remaining action
cards. Every player gathers his own followers.
- The winning player is determined according to the standard rules.
When a player wins, his partner wins with him. EXCEPTION: If Siam
is a British colony, then the teams combine their followers to count their complete
sets. If there is a tie, the team with the player who played an action card
last WINS.
Example: In a 4-player-game, Siam is a British colony. Alfred and Alice have
together 7 blue, 3 red, and 6 yellow followers. This are 3 complete sets. Benjamin
and Bertha have 4 complete sets, and therefore they are the winners.
Example: The Rama are reigning in Siam. Alfred has 4 yellow followers, Alice
has 3, Benjamin has 5, and Bertha has 1. Therefore Benjamin has won, and with him
Bertha.
- When creating an invitation, two versions are available: original
and open hand.
Original means that the card hands of your opponents are hidden and only
the topmost card of each opponent’s discard pile is visible to you.
- This is the official game version as described by the rules. -
Open hands means that you can see the remaining action cards of your opponents
at any time.
- This is an unofficial game variant. -
Please note that the latter variant might be more suitable for asynchronous, turn-based
online play, however, the game itself has been designed for the hidden version.
- The starting player is always randomly selected.
- The common pool (followers, markers) is shown in the upper right corner of
the game window, next to the publisher’s logo.
Please note that pool followers and markers are only shown if at least one
follower/marker is available. Otherwise, the space remains empty. The same is true
for the players’ collected followers.
- Your own player information is always at the bottom of the players area.
- Hover over the last move information of a player to see more details on the
game board.
- If a player has completed a power-struggle by passing, the last move information
of that player is "passed PS", otherwise only "passed".
- There are no reset-move restrictions during the game. You may always reset
your move.
- Action cards are activated by clicking on the card’s title on your
player info panel. Cards that have been played and discarded are grayed-out. You
can pass by clicking the pass button.
- At the end of your move, it is checked whether the next player(s) are able to
play cards, i.e. a player that can only pass will not get on turn, and will be skipped automatically.
You will get a message in that case.
- Note: The 4-player team game is currently
not available.
(quoted from the official rules booklet)
Douglas Adams once wrote: "What will happen, will happen." Certainly this
was so in the design of KING OF SIAM: I found it irresistible.
Everything started in late 2003 when I was in Siam, nowadays Thailand. I had been
working there for over a year as a teacher, and I was curious to learn more about
Thai history. But that wasn’t easy, since the International schools where
I was working did not teach Thai or Asian history, but only European history. Thus,
there were no books for me to read and no teachers for me to question. However,
what information I was able to gather fascinated me. Especially intriguing was the
fact that Siam was successful in averting colonization. By the start of the 20th
century, all of Southeast Asia was colonized except for Siam. How did the Siamese
accomplish that?
The idea for a game was born. What about a game where different factions fight for
domination in Siam, but every player has to take care that the British won’t
march in? Since there was never an open civil war in Siam, a political area-control
game seemed the best fit. I thought that the conflict would be to influence the
high nobility. The initial idea was that the British would invade if a power-struggle
ended in a tie. In the event of a British win, all players would lose. I thought
that this mechanism would simulate the cautious manoeuvring of the factions, which
tried to avoid open conflict at all costs. The British would intervene if a civil
war was threatening the kingdom. Civil war would result from a power vacuum - that
seemed logical to me. Unfortunately, this initial game design did not work, and
was not very original either. So, I put it on hold.
After my return to Europe and move to Berlin, I came in contact with several game
designers. I started to play their and my prototypes in private sessions. It was
in one of these sessions (playing another game) that I had the breakthrough idea:
The players should not have their own pieces on the board, but they should predict
which faction will win – just as it is written in the rules now. I then had the
idea to divide Siam in 8 provinces and introduced 8 actions which seemed plausible
to me. Originally, the Malays, Lao and Rama had individual special actions. It was
more elegant, however, to simplify this in the form of the cards "Rama",
"Malai", and "Lao". Since I had 8 provinces (each with their
own power-struggle) and 8 actions, I decided that these 8 actions should be enough
for the complete game. This reduced the "chaos" in the game and made it
very analytical. Basically, the first prototype of the second generation design
was very like the game you now have in your hands. Initially, however, the four
player game was not played by partnerships. One critical problem with the 4 player
game was that with 4 players and only 3 factions the game tended to end up as a
tie too often, and another problem was that the individual player did not have enough
control over game flow. Since I am a fan of partner games, the introduction of the
4 player rules was a logical change, and it did improve the game. (By the way: Some
players prefer to play the partner game with open communication. I am not a fan
of this variant, but if players want to, they are free to try it. The use of a secret
or coded information should still be forbidden, with all communication open so that
all players can understand it. Players may state what cards they have, but they
may not show them.) The last polish was given to the game with the aid of Richard
Stubenvoll: a few rough edges of the design were smoothed, the borders were adjusted
to better match those of 19th century Siam, and the game was tilted more towards
historical accuracy.
The 3 chosen factions had never been altered since the initial idea for the game:
In the South of Siam, there was the Islamic realm of Kedah. In South Thailand, there
is even today a lot of friction between the Muslims and the Buddhists. So this faction
was an obvious choice. As a second faction, I initially thought of the Burmese,
but there never was any Burmese influence in that period. Furthermore, conflict
with the Burmese was always of an external and military character, which was not
a fit with the political nature of the game. Part of what is now Laos, however,
was then part of Siam; and the Laotian people were not always happy about that.
Given this, I opted for the Lao. (By the way, the final game board correctly shows
the home province of the Lao. In the prototype versions, the Lao home province had
moved well to the west. This was a result of the fact that the first prototype gave
two home provinces to each faction. This was later changed to only one home province,
because it gave game play more variability.) The third faction was obvious again:
The Royalists, i.e. the Rama, who are the most important faction as per the historical
facts. In the early design stage, their importance was reflected by fixing the power-struggle
for Ayutthaya as the last and 8th power-struggle. Again, this was changed in order
to open up game play more.
It may be of some interest that intuition and induction were able to capture an
historical truth. It was only when doing the final graphical layout that I found
the 19th century Siam coat of arms. These show exactly the chosen 3 factions – so
to say as Siam’s constituting ethnic groups. I want to add that historically
the Malays should be pink and not blue. For reasons of colour psychology and better
visual differentiation, blue was used instead. I hope you are able to forgive us
this small inaccuracy.
Today, Thailand consists of more than 40 provinces, and in the year of 1874 there
were even more. For the game, I had to merge many of the provinces. My choices were
based on which provinces were important in the past as well as which provinces are
best known today.
Thai people are quite famous for their "Mai pen Lai!" ("That
doesn’t matter!") – This saying demonstrates quite a very relaxed
attitude towards the difficulties of life. This kind of relaxed attitude will help
you in playing KING OF SIAM, too. The trick is to know which province you should
give up and which you should never give up. Remember also that you cannot hold the
majority of all factions. Sooner or later you will have to decide which faction
you want to accumulate. The action card "Maharacha" is quite often underestimated,
though it is a quite powerful tool. By swapping the order of two power-struggles,
a power-struggle which is favourable for you may be decided earlier (so that you
can, for instance, make good use of a "Rama"-card directly after it).
But the "Maharacha"- card allows you also to "freeze" a province
containing a lot of troublesome followers (i.e. of a faction not favoured by you).
Note that the number of followers is limited. Especially in the four player game
this is one of the keys to victory. Once you have an advantage of two followers
of a faction, your control of it is quite safe. At that point, there is almost never
any need to gather more followers of this faction. A better idea is to accumulate
followers of a second faction, both to pressure on your opponents and to give yourself
a second way to win. Of course it is always wise not to waste your actions too early,
especially if your favoured faction seems likely to win.
In this spirit: Mai pen Lai!
Peer Sylvester, Berlin
|
Author:
|
Peer Sylvester
|
|
Artwork:
|
© Richard Shako
|
New game components
Note: The number of the various game components did not change.
- Game board (Ethiopia)
- Control markers
|
|
|
|
|
Amhara
|
Tigray
|
Shewa
|
Italians
|
- Followers (now using green instead of blue cubes)
- Marker "King" (Menelik II)
- Province tiles
- Action cards
|
Title of the action card:
|
Equivalent to (King of Siam):
|
|
Saba
|
Maharacha
|
|
Ityoppaya
|
Khon Thai
|
|
Ityoppaya
|
Khon Thai
|
|
1 vs 1
|
1 vs 1
|
|
2 vs 1
|
2 vs 1
|
|
Amhara
|
Rama
Lao
Malai
|
|
Tigray
|
|
Shewa
|
Game preparation
The game preparation is equivalent to King of Siam except for the following small changes:
-
In the green home province (Shewa), 1 green and 3 randomly chosen
followers are placed.
-
In the provinces Wollo and Herarghe, only 1 randomly chosen
follower is placed.
In reality, there are deserts in these parts of the country.
Course of the game
There are no changes regarding the course of the game and the winning conditions.
Now the Italians are part of the game instead of the British.
Designer’s Notes regarding the alternative map
King of Siam was published by Histogame 5 years ago. To celebrate this small
anniversary I created an alternative map - "The King of Saba".
This time the game is set in Ethiopia. This again is a country that has never been
colonised, despite several tries from the Italians and the British. This country
really was divided into three separate kingdoms: Amhara (with the old capital of
Gonder), Tigray (with Asmara, capital of Eritrea) and Shewa (ruled by the old dynasty
of kings). Menelik II unified the country and fought off the Italians. This background
is perfect for the game - probably even better than the original one.
In the East of the country there are several deserts. First I wanted to simulate
this through some special rules, but they weren’t really convincing. So now
there are just fewer followers to begin with.
I hope everyone who enjoys King of Siam will also have fun with King of Saba!
Kind regards,
Peer Sylvester
| |